As a physician and a candidate for the presidency, I approach the complex issue of abortion with a profound sense of respect for the sanctity of life and the principle of personal autonomy. I do not endorse abortion as a practice; however, I staunchly believe in the fundamental right of a woman to govern her own body. This conviction does not negate my recognition of the potentiality of life within her—a balance must be struck with the most profound care and consideration.
The crux of this debate often rests on the question: when does life begin? Scientifically and ethically, personhood starts when there is a viable and functioning nervous and cardiovascular system within the fetus, a stage when it could feasibly sustain life with current medical technology. At this juncture, the rights of the fetus should be given the same weight and consideration as a child who has been born.
In instances of rape or incest, the same principles should apply. These are incredibly sensitive and traumatic situations, and while the rights of the fetus are profoundly important, so too are the rights and the well-being of the woman who has endured such grievous harm. These decisions are deeply personal and should not be made lightly.
Moreover, I firmly believe that the states best decide the issue of abortion. The United States is a diverse tapestry of beliefs, values, and opinions, and what is deemed appropriate in one state may not be in another. Local governance allows for laws that reflect the values and consensus of the local populace, and it is at this level that the most equitable and sensitive resolutions can be found.
In the heartbreaking scenario of a genetic catastrophe, it is my conviction that the decision should rest with the parents, who must have the autonomy to choose the path forward. Should they opt not to carry the pregnancy to term, it is a decision made often in agonizing contemplation of the quality of life, potential suffering, and the extensive care needs the child may require—a responsibility that would otherwise fall to the state, with significant fiscal implications.
The narrative surrounding abortion is often painted in broad strokes of black and white, yet the reality is a kaleidoscope of grays, each unique to the individual and her circumstances. As President, my commitment would be to foster a climate of understanding, to uphold the dignity of personal choice within the framework of ethical consideration, and to respect the role of states in tailoring their policies to the needs and values of their communities.